They moved quickly, hired the best, and launched with great expectations. Certainly, this one would do the tricks. New displays in retail space, samples left in pet stores and on doorsteps, treats were given out at parks where people walk their dogs. No stone was left unturned in the dog world. They were going to know about this food. No dog left behind.
Then, the first quarter returns came in with the new thrust. No gains. Sales were the same. The CEO made another move, this time more drastic. He fired his marketing department and replaced them with the best and the brightest. Now finally, all the incompetence was eliminated. No more losers inside or outside the company.
Right in the middle of the meeting as he was breaking down delivery schedules in supply chains, space allocation in stores, demographics, and pricing of the advertising focus and other execution issues, a young somewhat quiet, non-assuming little manager raised his hand, “Sir, may I say something?” he said. “Yes, Jones. What is it?” the CEO inquired, a little thrown off by the interruption.
“Sir… the dog don’t like it.”
(2) But, what if the reality is that your marketing is the best in the world, but your dog food is horrible? - Better marketing only gets you more disappointed dogs and actually puts you further behind than if you sold less, because your brand is getting trashed. They have tried you and moved on. The substance, not the packaging, is ultimately most critical.